Say hello to Blockchain, digital disruption lies right around the corner

When I started looking at New Media as it was called then, it was something quite new. Blogging was in its infancy and neither Twitter nor Facebook had even been conceived. Watching this latest presentation from Don Tapscott, provided that same sense of excitement and optimism for our increasingly digital future.  

As ‘New Media’ became transplanted by ‘Web 2.0’ in my early presentations (thanks Tim O’Reilly), and then became ‘Social Media’ and finally ‘Social Business’, I had already discussed with hundreds of companies the wide array of applications on offer as well as the customer-led benefits and strategies on how to ‘get there’.

Social Media, unlike Web 1.0, provides virtual places for users anywhere with any particular interest to find their tribe and hang-out (in a way that suits them e.g. in a game, blog or video channel). It is firmly about communities, networks, being social, peering, sharing, openness and empowering individuals.

“This thing has the power to change everything”

While the features of Social Media have not changed, in the early days there was an excitement that can only come with the knowledge that ‘this thing’ has the power to change everything. Consumers now have more and better choices. Organisations and governments can no longer take it as read that we believe their news (nor will they ever again truly control that message, as the Arab Spring showed).

Crowdsourcing is still creating viable, alternative sources of information (e.g. via ratings & review sites, online encyclopaedias, social networks) and alternative free or low cost products-services. In so doing, we have viewed disruption on an unprecedented scale. Social Media has changed beyond recognition the print media industry and is now producing new and ‘unwelcome’ competitors in quite unusual places e.g. Uber, AirBnB, Netflix, Spotify, WhatsApp, and so on.

Reflecting on where we are now, while there have certainly been changes, so much has also stayed the same. Companies have adapted, adding a social media department but many are largely continuing as before (are they truly customer focused – has consumer empowerment really made a difference)? The promise of new and exciting companies that value their users as much as they obtain value from them has not been realised. We may even have replaced old and greedy pre-digital companies with their Social Media equivalents? Certainly, the age of Social Media (and Facebook) it could be argued has done little for wealth equality.

As consumers and contributors we have also lost. While the system of Intellectual Property was old and antiquated, this does not make right an absence of remuneration for creative artists. Nor should we lose site of the fact that we have in many ways lost control of our data and of our privacy and created a new set of threats including cyber fraud and identity theft.

And it is here that I’d like you to view this recent Ted Talk with Don Tapscott. As I watched this short video I felt once more that sense of excitement and optimism from all those years ago.

Your comments as always are most welcome.

Alan

Fixing the web, one fantastic crowdsourced project at a time

I stumbled on a TED video from Luis von Ahn the other week, I urge you to view it if you haven’t already – you can see it embedded below.

What is so incredible about Luis, is that he has implemented not one but two incredible projects aimed at solving some of the web’s biggest problems whilst using the power of the crowd. Does it work? You bet it does.

His first company reCaptcha focused on digitising books, making knowledge more accessible to more people worldwide. You’ve probably already used it. It is the field in an online form where it asks you to type the characters shown in an image. It prevents software from automatically completing millions of forms; an important service for thousands of companies, including TicketMaster, Twitter and Facebook. The really clever part is that Luis and his team throw up two images to be decyphered in every reCaptcha form. One is required to authenticate the form whilst the other is a word from a book that has yet to be decyphered. Millions of books have now been digitised thanks to reCaptcha forms. Not surprisingly, Google bought his company in 2009.

His next project, Duolingo is even more ambitious. He wants to translate the web and that’s no easy task. In fact, if you’ve ever used Babblefish or Google Translate, you’ll know that translation software has a ways to go. A quick calculation also revealed that to do this through human translators would be more expensive than anyone could afford or would be willing to pay.

Could the crowd help? Well yes. Duolingo provides language courses for anyone, completely for free. However, the clever part is that as part of the learning experience, students will get to translate ‘live’ pages from the web. Not only does Luis not need to pay for these translations but learners are keen to do this work. A transparent crowdsourced review process ensures that the quality of each translation is high.

I’ve been using this tool on my PC and on my mobile for a few weeks now and from my experience it works brilliantly. Having achieved a base level of Spanish I’ve now started to translate my first web pages. Every translation I make helps my language skills. Brilliant. Hats off to you Luis.

Do you have similar examples of great crowdsourced projects you’d like to share?

Look forward to your comments.

Alan

If you’d cut off your nose what else would you do?

An engaging discussion yesterday with my e-marketing students around the latest socialnomics video (see below).
One stat stood out and elicited the most interesting views of the day.
According to the video ‘53% would rather lose their sense of smell than their technology’.
A worrying stat in my view but understandable to my students – “makes sense, I panic if I don’t have my phone…I don’t really use my sense of smell much”.
Wow. 3 things struck me almost immediately:
1. Your food isn’t going to taste of anything, have you thought this through?
2. I’m out of touch with just how connected the net generation are
3. Perhaps the sixth sense should be about being connected.

Views welcome. What would you give up for your phone?

Alan

#Socialnomics 2014 by Erik Qualman: http://youtu.be/zxpa4dNVd3c

10 tips for designing an online survey

With the growth and availability of Online survey tools (like Survey Monkey) it may seem like a fairly simple task to conduct your own market research surveys. Just ask some questions and collect their responses and you have low cost insight! However there are many pitfalls and traps inexperienced researchers can fall into.

Follow these 10 tips in your survey design and ensure that your online research project is a success.

1. Set clear research objectives                                                                 

Image with a man aiming at a target

From the outset you should be clear about what you want to achieve. Your research objectives …specifically what you wish to find out…are your blueprint for designing a survey and if your objectives are clear, your questionnaire will follow suit. There is little point asking questions that do not relate to your research objectives. The key here is to be succinct and straight to the point with your aims, and don’t start by trying to word the questions (which is a common mistake!).

2. Think ahead to your findings

You should consider how you will capture and analyse the collected data before you start the process. A great tip is to test the survey on colleagues (a pilot survey), as it will allow you to download the data to see how it is structured (as well as highlight any flaws in the survey design). If you are looking to segment your findings make sure you allow for this by asking the right questions. Some survey software even has an option to create dummy data before a survey is live. All of these approaches can help you visualise your data and anticipate any issues. Think ahead to your findings.

3. Questions should be direct and clear

You may only have one chance to ask the respondent a question so ensure it makes sense and cannot be misinterpreted. Consider the following question: do you drive a car? This question is ambiguous and can be interpreted in many ways; personally owning a car, having access to a car in a household, having a company car or a car for business use, or even having passed your test. If you want to know if the respondent owns a car then ask them directly and unambiguously. Put yourself in the position of the respondent, ask yourself the question and try and work out how you would respond.  Better still ask colleagues to pilot and test your question for comprehension.

4. Avoid double-barrelled questions

A common mistake! Double-barrelled questions ask two questions and leave the respondent unsure about how best to respond. For example, ‘did you enjoy the play and was the seat comfortable?’ Ask one question at a time and if they are similar, consider making the font bold to ensure the respondent can easily see the difference.

5. Avoid leading questions 

Some questions appear to lead the respondent. For example, ‘do you agree with the view that…?’ suggests a particular response and will influence some respondents.

6. Answer options should be unambiguous and balanced

Ambiguous defined in an imageEnsure your answer options cannot be misinterpreted.You should always avoid terms such as ‘often’ and ‘regularly’ as measures of frequency. They can be ambiguous as respondents may operate with different frames of reference. For example, ‘regularly’ may mean monthly to one person whereas it may mean weekly to another. Whenever possible try to ask about actual frequency such as, ‘more than once a month’, ‘once a month’, ‘2 or 3 times a month’ etc. For closed questions, ensure the available answers are balanced e.g. extremely satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, extremely dissatisfied.

7. Avoid technical terms

If your language is confusing it may lead to a respondent becoming frustrated and even terminating the survey. So avoid jargon at all costs! Use simple, clear and plain language that is straight to the point. If you are struggling, the Plain English Campaign has a useful A-Z of alternate words.

8. Question Order

It is important that the order of questions does not influence your results. Therefore, questions have to be asked in a sequence that does not unnecessarily prompt or remind respondents prior to capturing their initial thoughts. Demographic and classification questions are best left to the end of the sequence as these can be the least interesting from the respondents perspective. If sensitive questions e.g. age, income and gender are asked too early in the survey, it can lead to early termination.

9. Use of space and design  

A survey is no different from any other marketing material; it should be visually appealing – perhaps brand aligned – and easy to read. Avoid cluttering questions together at it may confuse respondents.

10. Piloting

Piloting is imperative, you should always strive to test your survey on a small number of respondents – if this is not possible test it on your colleagues. People may not understand what you are asking and you may need to modify your questions to get what you want. If you don’t pilot test and work out those problems, the results from the final survey may be inadequate. Verifying the survey in this way, allows revising and editing questions before going live.

I hope this advice is useful. As always your comments are most welcome.

Jim

Check out other related posts in this series including Quantitative research – when and why to use it?

Jim Law owns Wild Heather Digital Research. WHDR uses the latest technology to deliver primary research insights to organisations. We offer online quantitative and online qualitative research services, including the development and use of panels and broad based consultation programmes in addition to online group discussions, depth interviews and online survey.

 

Radical transparency – are you brave enough?

This is a neat video from Jeffrey Hollender discussing the concept of Radical Transparency. By that we mean sharing in public product reviews and a warts and all reality of the customer experience.

Why is it radical? Because so few companies would ever consider it.

Personally, I think this is a great idea and an opportunity for competitive advantage. The trick is to get there first and to have a collective mindset that views feedback as positive.

I think there are already a few embracing Radical Transparency. T-Mobile would be one.

Your views and comments are much appreciated.

Alan

 

Quantitative research – when and why to use it?

Jim LawI am going to discuss the whys and wherefores of Quantitative research (this builds on my series of posts on digital research and follows on from my recent post on Qualitative research). Remember, quantitative and qualitative research methodologies are not in direct competition. Both have their merits, and your research objectives and scope should decide which to use.

Quantitative research

Tally_marks_counting_visitorsQuantitative research is the collection of attitudes and opinions through counting

Data is usually collected through surveys (online, face-to-face, telephone) and much less frequently paper self-completion (postal return). Conducted properly it can give a valid projection of the views of an entire population or target group (within predictable margins of error). A common expression is that:

you don’t need to eat the whole cake to find out what it tastes like – you just need a sufficiently large ‘bite’ i.e. ‘a sample’

It tends to use very structured questionnaires with a range of question formats including:

  • closed (pre-coded options),
  • open (where text can be inserted),
  • rating and scale formats including ranking, attitude banks and agree / disagree statements

When to use

Time by Jeff McNeillWhen you need statistical based evidence
To measure levels of awareness, knowledge,  behaviour and understanding
To measure strength of feeling
To find out if there is a consensus on a particular issue
Project results to the general population
Describe characteristics of relevant groups of people
Identify market segments
To compare differences across different parts of the research target
To help recommend a final course of action

Qualitative and Quantitative research?

Both methodologies can complement each other, when used together. Combining methodologies will generate statistical evidence and also illuminate the ‘why’ and ‘how’ beneath the number.

Mixed approach

The diagram above demonstrates how quantitative and qualitative can be used together to define and assist each methodology. A hibrid approach will deliver a more rounded view.

If your budget doesn’t allow for a mixed methodology approach ensure you select an approach that best fits your research objectives. For example, don’t expect a long questionnaire will give you all the in-depth information you can get through qualitative research methods – it is more likely to bore the respondent and you will get diminishing returns!

As always your comments are most welcome.

Jim

This was prepared by Jim Law of Wild Heather Digital Research. WHDR uses the latest technology to deliver primary research insights to organisations. We offer online quantitative and online qualitative research services, including the development and use of panels and broad based consultation programmes in addition to online group discussions, depth interviews and online survey.

This Twitter banter takes the biscuit

Check out this fun exchange between some very well known brands on Twitter. These companies get that ‘social’ media is first and foremost, social. Compare their approach to social media with that of the vast majority of businesses. A lot to be said for a bit of humour and a bit of human.

Tesco mobile logoTesco Mobile enters hilarious debate with Jaffa Cakes, Yorkshire Tea on Twitter: Tesco Mobile has taken a conversational approach to its Twitter feed to a new level with this hilarious debate involving brands such as Yorkshire Tea, Jaffa Cakes and Cadbury…read more on the marketing magazine web site.

As always your comments are most welcome.

Alan

Qualitative research – do you understand why and when to use it?

Jim LawMy next posts in the digital research series looks at Quantitative and Qualitative research. First things first –  they are not direct alternatives. Both methodologies have their merits and your research objectives and scope should determine which methodology fits best. 

Qualitative research

The qualitative research process is a question the answers‘journey of discovery’

Qualitative research is by definition investigative, it is often used to:

  • understand an issue or concept from the target audience viewpoint
  • define the problem or develop an approach to the problem
  • go deeper into the issues of interest and explore nuances

Common data collection methods used in qualitative research are focus groups (which can be online or conventional face to face sessions), one to one in-depth interviews (which can be online, face to face or telephone) and ethnographic participant observation. They often work best with interaction and discussion during the research process; don’t use a fixed questionnaire but rather use a semi-structured discussion topic guide. This allows the researcher to follow up on any areas of interest.

When to use

Time by Jeff McNeill

  • To develop an initial understanding of a problem
  • To unearth a range of feeling about an issue
  • To investigate strengths and weaknesses of a concept, proposition or creative approach
  • To uncover underlying motivations and factors that influence decision making and decisions
  • To provide preliminary information needed to design a quantitative study
  • To help explain the findings of a quantitative study – justifications for attitudes or behaviour

Qualitative research allows for the use of ‘stimulus’ material such as advertising concepts, design ideas and concept descriptions. It can include elements of co-creation with respondents involved in the evolution of a concept. Sessions can also be ‘deliberative’ where information and detail is provided during the sessions to understand how opinions change with specific understanding.

Quantitative and Qualitative research?

Both methodologies are complementary. Qualitative research can provide the rationale behind the statistics. It can also help inform the ‘quantitative’ researcher in terms of what questions to ask in the survey.

Mixed approach

The above diagram demonstrates how quantitative and qualitative can be used together to define and assist each methodology. A mixed approach will deliver a well-rounded project with a combination of statistical evidence and in-depth analysis.

If your budget doesn’t allow for a mixed methodology approach ensure you select an approach that best fits your research objectives.

For example, never assume that doing more focus groups is a substitute for quantitative research and never count numbers in groups – it is unlikely to be a representative sample and could give flawed results. Groups contain ‘representatives FROM’ a target audience and can’t be ‘statistically representative OF’ a target audience.

As always your comments are most welcome.

Jim

This was prepared by Jim Law of Wild Heather Digital Research. WHDR uses the latest technology to deliver primary research insights to organisations. We offer online quantitative and online qualitative research services, including the development and use of panels and broad based consultation programmes in addition to online group discussions, depth interviews and online survey.

What is marketing according to SAP?

What is marketing is an apt question for our digital age, what with the “tectonic shifts” taking place in technology and consumer behaviour.  

We think Michael Brenner at SAP goes some way towards answering this question. According to SAP…

  1. The future of marketing is content marketing
  2. The future of content marketing is…
    • Visual media, mobile
    • Customer value, customer stories
    • Brands as publishers, brands and publishers

It’s time for companies to look at new ways to engage and energise their customers, take a leaf out of SAP’s book. Forget (or at least de-emphasise) traditional channels and broadcast messages.

The hard fact is this…

Brands and companies will need to fight hard for our (their customer’s) very limited attention

and that can only be a good thing.

As always your comments are most welcome.

Alan

68 ‘incredible’ customer service stats

We have enclosed below our Prezi of 68 ‘incredible’ customer service stats. We have compiled and classified the key findings from several articles and reports, across the following areas:

Customer Service +…

  • the use of new and existing support channels
  • service response times and expectations
  • impact on purchases and level of spend
  • customer experience and the “brand” 
  • level of switching
  • effect on wider costs and values
  • word of mouth impact both positive and negative
  • company progress: strategy and process

We think customer service is a key area for ‘digital’ differentiation. Some companies are approaching this area well (the topic of future posts), others less so. Customer service has never been more difficult to get right nor more critical than it is today.

Link to 68 incredible customer service stats on Prezi

As always, your comments are most welcome.

Alan